Confusing Medium And Messaging
You’ve Got Better Things To Do, Al.
I’m very much in the camp of privacy protection being a default approach, and I believe the pipes and tubes providing access to the information age should be regulated for the benefit of the citizenry, but at which point did citizens and users stop being responsible for their own approach to being informed?
The web is wide and deep and I’ve not found it hard at all to locate information of wildly divergent points of view on any given subject.
If citizens choose to live in an echo chamber, whether that's provided by Facebook or Twitter, that’s hardly new, and should be no more governed than one’s choice of books to be read or plays to be seen. Further, if a citizen chooses to be commoditized in order to benefit in some way they value, I don’t consider that wise, but I definitely consider it a choice they should be allowed to make.
Will this allow shadow players to insert poisoned whispers into those chambers? Certainly! You can explain to the tobacco industry and George W's council for selling the Iraq war how that's new.
Don’t get me wrong, these companies are part of the principalities and powers, and I would encourage distrust as a foundation for dealing with any of them, but if the goal is to protect users from their own biases, I see this kind of finger pointing as a waste of time.